Game 52: Hive Live
Orlando 85 (39-14) | New Orleans 117 (32-20)
Chris. Paul. Is. Freakin. Amazing.
Holy awesome point guards! Did anybody see that win coming? Even if, for some insane reason, you actually believed we stood a chance against Dwight "47/19/8" Howard with no one to guard him in the paint, there's no way you'd have predicted we'd outscore them in the paint 44 to 18 or that we'd win by more than 20 points, right?
Chris was a monster tonight. He dropped 36 points, 10 assists, 6 rebounds, 3 steals, and 1 turnover in... are you ready for this... 33 minutes of playing time. Crazy, right? He started the game by dropping his first six shots and, by the time four and a half minutes ticked off the clock, he had 12 of our first 17 points. Amazing.
Five other guys added double-digit point totals (but none had more than 15), but the real credit for this victory goes to the Hornets' interior defense. I'll say it again, since it bears repeating. Our interior defense was a major factor in our win tonight. The Magic ran a weak-side iso to Howard for most of the first half (which any coach with sense would have tried), but Hilton and Kiwi stepped up to the challenge in a major way. Both got owned a few times (it just happens when you have the unpleasant assignment of guarding Howard), but they also held Dwight to a very human 12 points, 8 boards which, in case anyone is interested, is exactly one point better than Melvin Ely's performance tonight. Granted, they were never really on the court at the same time, but still... Dwight barely outperformed Melvin Ely. Crazy.
As awesome as this performance was, I don't think it completely erases the memory of the walloping this team gave us for Christmas (which, like tonight's game, was also on national television). Regardless, it was a solid step towards the larger goal of regaining the ground (and confidence) we lost leading into the All-Star break.
Let's hope we can carry some of this energy over to Friday's game against the Lakers.
***
Couple of observations before I leave you:
- We shot awesome as a team tonight: 58% from the field, 50% from beyond the arc. However, we only managed 60% of our free throws (Melvin alone missed 5). It didn't bite us tonight, but we've got to do better than that on something deemed a "free" throw. Fortunately, the Magic only hit 55% from the stripe.
- Got to hand it to Marks and Hilton tonight. I know I already pointed out their efforts on defense, but I think it's worth reiterating. Doing the dirty work isn't sexy–and it won't always show in a box score–but these guys took the hits and the fouls. And in the end, they held a beast of a player in check.
- Dwight Howard might be the most likeable guy in the league. He's always smiling. He dances to the songs at halftime. He (playfully) trash talks with 7 year old fans. And he's awesome at basketball (except for tonight). You couldn't ask for a nicer guy to anchor your team. There's probably a different discussion to be had about whether or not your star should have a bit of mean streak in him (yes, please), but Howard is just plain fun to watch both on and off the court.
- Quick rule question for anyone who knows: if a shooting foul is whistled and the fouled player's shot is goal-tended, does he get the points and one? Dwight blocked one off the board tonight against... well, I forget, but it was after a whistle that prompted a trip to the charity stripe. Even if I mis-saw the play, what would happen in the scenario I described above? I mean, there's no way players can get away with goal-tending on a shooting foul, otherwise, everybody would do it and we'd never see an and-1. Right?
- Slightly unrelated to this game: I'm worried about this Tyson thing. I was just getting used to his departure, but now the team that made out like bandits doesn't even want him and we're right back where we were with regards to the luxury tax for next season. I don't really know what to make of this stuff anymore.
Photos courtesy of espn.com
Composed to: Danger Mouse's The Grey Album
The opponent's take: Third Quarter Collapse
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
I wish we traded Tyson!
WORD re last bullet-point. I would take the rescinded Wilcox and Joe Smith bench help PLUS our rotation of bigs sans a perpetually hampered Tyson any day of the week now, instead of what we’re going to have to deal with now. The offense ran much faster/efficiently than it did/will do again with Tyson didn’t it? Maybe an easy observation, & I’m not going to take a stab at quanitfying it. Perhaps it’s attributable that the Magic don’t have a starting PG to speak of, but I thought CP & co looked much more fluid & in a groove that they didn’t have to hold up for Tyson to lumber down, which stands to happen exponentially more given his injury’s apparently recurrent
by Abstract Capital on Feb 18, 2009 11:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That is just dumb. Your saying that based on LAST NIGHTS RESULTS. Tyson is better then them with his eyes closed. Puh-lease!
Devin Brown is a basketball God!
by chandlerfan6 on Feb 19, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The past several weeks have shown
our interior defense is worse without Tyson. No question. No one denies Tyson is a good defender. In the long run (ignoring cap issues), we’re way better with him, and 98% of Hornets fans, many of whom understand the game intricately, are ecstatic to hear he is back.
by m-W on Feb 18, 2009 11:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
But as excited as I am, I’m still a tad worried. I’ll let Curry down at Hometown Hornets take over from here:
I welcome Tyson back to the team, and I’m excited to have the Crescent City Connection live on. But I’m anxious that his history of foot injuries might hamper his future. If that’s the case, it puts this team at a serious disadvantage.
http://www.hometownhornets.blogspot.com/
by hldomingue on Feb 19, 2009 9:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Stunning
The Magic shot horribly, but our TEAM played as close to a flawless game as I have seen them play. I’d like to think that it was because they knew (before we did) that Tyson was coming back. I could not understand why they looked so happy during the game, while I was still a little pissed off. Maybe they are just professionals, but maybe they knew a little sump’n sump’n.
You need to add Chris Paul’s block to your stat line. He equaled Dwight Howard in blocks, had 2 fewer turnovers, 3 times as many points, and only 2 less rebounds! MVP, MVP, MVP……
I don’t think turf toe will hamper Tyson’s defense as much as his offensive rebounding and put-backs. I’ll bet somebody could prove that is where we have seen the drop-off in both points and rebounds this year. I can live with “only” having one of the best defensive centers in the game. Basically he’ll be a personable, less freaky-looking version of Ben Wallace until his toe heals. If we have to limit his minutes like the Suns do for Shaq, that’s not going to kill us either. Just use him against top Western Conference teams. Remember, it’s all about the PLAYOFFS, and for Tyson that means limiting the opponent’s starters every other day at most. No back-to-backs and full access to the training staff.
by NOEngineer on Feb 19, 2009 7:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Look out Tyson
I hope Robert Horry doesn’t come back for one game to step on Tyson’s toe…….
by NOEngineer on Feb 19, 2009 7:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
HA!
The possible return of Cheap Shot Rob…
http://www.hometownhornets.blogspot.com/
by hldomingue on Feb 19, 2009 9:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Telling stat
I think last night’s game can be summed up with just one sentence from the AP recap…
“Late in the first quarter, Paul had 16 points, three assists and four rebounds, compared to 14 points, four assists and three rebounds for the entire Orlando team.”
by Man in the Arena on Feb 19, 2009 1:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Am I crazy ...
Thought I saw Chris Wilcox playing last night, but I think it must have been Melvin Ely right? Wilcox under NBA rules wasn’t allowed to play until Chandler passed (knowing he failed) his physical correct?
Confused Nuggets fan …
by Nate Timmons on Feb 19, 2009 3:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Re:
“That is just dumb. Your saying that based on LAST NIGHTS RESULTS. Tyson is better then them with his eyes closed. Puh-lease!”
Good argument.
by Abstract Capital on Feb 20, 2009 2:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The past several weeks have shown
“our interior defense is worse without Tyson. No question. No one denies Tyson is a good defender. In the long run (ignoring cap issues), we’re way better with him, and 98% of Hornets fans, many of whom understand the game intricately, are ecstatic to hear he is back.”
This is more palatable, slightly.
“In the long run (ignoring cap issues), we’re way better with him” – Umm the cap issues are the focal point of this entire situation, this season, next season, & Chandler being Bower’s only chip to play. I read your previous comments and you suggested we should trade an unused wing and a backup big man we don’t like. I know of no team that will take Peja unless we trade him for virtually nothing, or Mo-Pete and his $5,784,480, $6,212,960, $6,641,440 over the next 3 years
Can either of you name ANY names?: http://hoopshype.com/salaries/new_orleans.htm
Your arguments are predicated on either ignoring the salary cap situation or dreamweaving retention of Chandler as if you can dump bad salaries like it’s a video game with the cheats on.
Are you playing NBA2K9 because I don’t know what planet these trade alternatives to Tyson are remotely plausible. How that makes sense I do not know
“and 98% of Hornets fans, many of whom understand the game intricately, are ecstatic to hear he is back.” – Hahaha WHAT? Our fans know the game intricately. Haha! What does that even MEAN?
And you want to certify the valence of your claim by ignoring that it’s inevitable the Hornets financial situation compels them to trim the team payroll to avoid the lux tax? I almost forgot, AND further qualifying it by saying that the fans are ecstatic. Oh and saying (whatever the hell this means) that they know the game intricately.
How is this even close to a serious argument???
by Abstract Capital on Feb 20, 2009 3:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lay off the Red Bull....
Remain calm, and try to avoid focusing on other people’s grammar, word selection, or spelling. Focus on the point they are making.
The luxury tax does not prevent the team from doing anything, unless the owner runs out of money. If we win the NBA chanpionship Shinn could put the extra money he gets from playoff games at the Arena into the bank to pay the tax the next year. It’s not likely that he’ll think that way, but it could happen. My point is, if we improve on last year’s performance just a little bit, the luxury tax becomes less of an issue. I believe that Tyson, even at this year’s level of contribution, will help us win playoff series with his defense on elite big men. Many others do also. Many of us also think that making decisions that weaken this year’s team based on next year’s POTENTIAL luxury tax level is premature and a betrayal of the contract we made when we bought season tickets a year in advance. I hope this explanation is intricate enough for you….
by NOEngineer on Feb 20, 2009 3:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'd ask you to chill out but you're frontin that pretty well
A) Grammar, word selection, or spelling? I fail to see how anyone’s been reamed for bad spelling or sentence structure. I’d ask you to chill out but you’re frontin that pretty well cool cat, keep frontin
B) But I misspoke, and that is on me. What I refer to is the salary cap, not the luxury tax. This might have been inferrable but that’s a moot point. If we explode the threshold limits of the allowable salary cap, we pay 6$+ mil in taxes, which will not make B.1) Ownership more willing to think liberally or creatively about the team’s future/moves to make this team more competitive and will B.2) Likely turn Shinn-into-Don Sterling & ownership will clutch their benjamins for the foreseeable future (he has no trouble alienating fans for money, re: Charlotte)
C) Your arg is that a hurt Tyson, going forward, possibly getting hurt worse and regressively productive, can help us win a playoff series. I’ve asked for any citation of a prominent player with turf toe (let alone recurrent turf toe and an ankle injury bad enough to make Presti axe a trade he’s probably wanted to pull the trigger on since Seattle) in ANY sport recover sufficient form to be consistently good. So far all I’ve heard is “I think, and many others think, TC will help us play defense against good oppo big men”, with no past proof whatsoever, except for more ad homs.
I say again, no key player in any major sport, NFL, MLB, nobody, has spontaneously recovered from this recurrent & debilitating injury in-season without significant time off. And by significant, I mean over 3 months. I also do not understand your final arg about the season tickets contract situation, and am frankly mystified about where you’re going with that chief. I’m sorry you invested in the team thinking it might be better but investments carry inherent risks so I don’t see how your contract has been “betrayed”, since that the team would be good is an assumption you made, not a promise the team made to you.
Take it easy there billy badass, don’t blow a gasket with those .. .. ..
by Abstract Capital on Feb 20, 2009 4:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















