The J Stands for Jumper
[Caleb462's first post of many here on @tH... I think he nailed it -R]
When the trade with Philadelphia went down this past September, there weren't too many folks excited about the prospect of Jason Smith as a Hornet. Oh sure, you can always find someone with a rooting interest in any NBA player. This usually happens because they attended the same university as the player or are from the same geographical area. As an aside, there are also the times that someone has a few really good games with a player in a video game and this skews their view of the player's actual capabilities. A couple of years ago I was convinced that Charlie Bell was a productive NBA player because he was killing it in my NBA 2K8 season. As it turns out, that was false.
But let's get back to the topic at hand. Now I'm not saying anyone was particularly upset about the Philadelphia trade, but at the time it seemed like an exchange of spare parts that would barely make a ripple in the overall makeup of the Hornets. The general reaction from fans and media alike was "move along, nothing to see here." We are now two months removed from the trade and Smith has become a fan favorite who has made a small but significant impact on a number of wins for the Hornets.There was also apparently a guy named Willie Green involved in the trade, but I've never heard of him. Regardless, today marks exactly two months since Jason Smith became a Hornet so in order to celebrate that two month anniversary let's take a closer look at what Smith has done.
His basic per game stats (through 12 games) of 6.9 PPG, 4.1 RPG, and 0.8 APG on 45.3% from the field are nothing special. If you extrapolate those numbers to 36 minutes, you get averages of 13.2 PTS, 7.8 RBS and 1.6 ASTS. That looks a little more substantial, but it's not going to wow anyone. Nonetheless, if you start examining Jason's numbers in the context of his career as a whole, and look beyond the basic per game and per minute numbers, you'll see that Jason is having himself a bit of a breakout season. He is posting career bests in Offensive Rating (104), Defensive Rating (100), PER (12.7), Offensive Rebound Percentage (9.8%), Total Rebound Percentage (12.5%), Turnover Percentage (10.8%), and True Shooting Percentage (.503). He also has the ball in his hands more, posting a career high usage rate of 19.1%. Basically the only thing he is doing LESS of is blocking shots. Otherwise, Jason is the most productive player he's ever been. This confirms what our eyes have been telling us.
With that said, it should be noted that some of these increases are slight, and though improvement is great you have to consider what level the jumping off point is at. We are basically seeing Smith go from a well below average player to a slightly below average or perhaps simply average player. That's okay though. I tend to believe that statistics, while always important, are less important for players who have minor but clearly defined roles and who excel in those specific roles. That is Jason Smith to a tee. He will play the pick and pop game and hit the midrange jumper, and when he's not doing that he'll hustle his head off to do whatever else he can to help the team. That's his role. His limitations will prevent him from filling up the stat sheet, but nonetheless he's a player that, as a fan, you really like seeing on the floor during his regular 10-20 minutes a game.
Of course, one could ask.... couldn't the same be said for Darius Songaila? Where was the love for Songaila last year? Aren't they basically the same player? Not quite. Their roles are nearly identical, but while Songaila had his good nights and always seemed to do what he could, he was never the mad hustler that Jason Smith is. Smith also has one other clear advantage over Darius Songaila, and that is rebounding. Smith is a mediocre rebounder for a power forward, but Songaila is just plain awful in that department. It is also important to consider expectations. What Songaila brought to the Hornets is exactly what most Hornets fans expected. Contrast this with Jason Smith, of whom very little was expected, and you can see where the excitement about Smith has come from. Due to low expectations, Smith was given the opportunity to pleasantly surprise us. Another important difference is that Jason Smith is young and though his role is clearly defined, in a sense he is still figuring out who he is as an NBA player. There's the potential he could continue to get better. Songaila was already an established player when he joined the Hornets and it was never likely that he would get any better (or worse) in the immediate future. So partially its a matter of perception, but its partially production as well. Ultimately I do believe that Jason Smith brings a bit more to this team than Songaila did and I am quite happy that he is now a Hornet. Dell Demps is a smart guy.
In closing, I'd like to say... let's give this man a nickname. I've heard "J-Smooth", which is isn't bad, but it's already associated with Josh Smith. I came up with "The Long J," due to Smith's penchant for mid-range and long two-pointers, but I have to admit it's pretty lame. Gil McGregor seems to think that simply calling him "Jason Smith" and emphasizing the "J" suffices for a nickname. I do not agree. So let's try to come up with something. He's earned it.
How about "Jumpersmith"? Like a locksmith, only his trade is jumpers, not locks. No?
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have a lot of questions about Jason Smith
It seems like on offense, he’s getting tons of easy shots – he usually has a 4-foot radius around him without a defender when he pops to take a 20-foot jumper. I never saw him play before he came to the Hornets, so I don’t know if he was getting these easy looks previously.
Is his breakout sustainable? More specifically – is his jump in production due to fitting really well with a Hornets offensive scheme that generates lots of open jumpers for him? Even if that was the case, what explains his improved rebounding and defense?
Good questions
I can’t say I saw him play much before either, I’m basing all my pre-Hornets impressions on statistics.
“Is his breakout sustainable?”
I would think yes, absolutely. As a stated in the article, its not as if he’s gone from bad to great, he’s just gone from bad to knocking on the door of average. You have to think that is sustainable and I think its possible he continues to improve.
“More specifically – is his jump in production due to fitting really well with a Hornets offensive scheme that generates lots of open jumpers for him?”
I think system may be a big part of it. We’ve seen that Chris Paul and the Hornets scheme tends to generate a lot of open looks for big men who can shoot the mid-range jumper. It started with David West, and we saw the same with Sean Marks and Darius Songaila. Now Jason Smith and (presumably) David Andersen get to benefit from it as well. I think you can look at system on the defensive end also. We have seen Smith get exposed on D a few times, and we’ve also seen him play solid D other times. The solid defensive rating (101) suggests that he’s able to hold his own as a contributor to overall team defense, but sometimes he’s going to get burned by the better big men in the league.
As for his rebounding, it hasn’t improved much – last night’s game knocked his total rebounding percentage down to 12.1%, exactly what it was last year in Philly. However, he has seen a small bump in offensive rebounding percentage. Like I said, some of these improvements are slight, but taken on the whole they do point to an improving player or at least a player who has found a better fit.
A few reasons for the improved numbers
I have to say that I’m not totally suprised by Smith’s improvement for one big reason…this is Smith’s second year after an ACL injury. Usually it takes two years before a player fully rebounds from an injury like that, and I’d argue that was the case with Smith. In his second year back he is able to show a bit more of the quickness and intensity that were part of the reason why he was drafted.
I do hope that he will fight a bit harder for some of those rebounds, but otherwise, he is a very adequate backup 4.
Nice take....
…. I am curious to see how Smith and Anderson coexist on the 2nd unit since it appears that they both have the same game.
by 3ptace on Nov 23, 2010 12:57 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I like Smith
And I understand Brian Ball above when he questions why Smith is wide open when he shoots.
In my opinion, that is exactly when, and only when, he should be taking that shot.
The only other time is if something terrible has gone wrong and the ball is in his hands as the shot clock is near end.
However, he is surrounded by very good outside shooters.
His main job then is pick/roll/ if nothing inside-pass-out…AND rebounds.
The simple added option of his being “sometimes” able to shoot the long ball is nothing but all-good gravy.
Great Article
Really good job, Caleb, especially for your first for the site.
Onto Jason Smith, I had a lot of doubts about him coming in. I was one of the most vocal here on the site in stating how much I hated the trade originally and how little faith I actually had in Jason. He even had a good preseason and I was still skeptical. All that said, he’s really been great for the team off the bench all things considered. If you sit back and observe it so far, he’s been the team’s most consistent back-up (take that for what it’s worth). He’s done great.
As far as a nickname, his original name is so bland that it rolls right off the tongue. I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to refer to him as anything other than Jason Smith.
"You play to win the game."

by 





















